"Ugh I don’t know what movie to watch! #bored #firstworldprobs"
I’m sure a few people have come across a tweet similar to
this one, if not multiple of them. I think we all come across that problem
every once in a while, the desire to go see a movie but without the clue as to
which one to buy the ticket for. So what do we do? We ask our friends or look
up reviews online to get an idea of it’ll be a waste of money or not. Movies
are a cultural facet of storytelling that has progressed from word of mouth and
drawings to moving pictures in high-definition and quality surround sound; and
people just like re-telling a story to a friend are going to review them for
others. That’s what I wanted to focus on, how different people review this common
movie culture and how that review comes off to readers. I recently saw the
movie Warm Bodies and personally really enjoyed it, so I decided to pick that
movie as a basis for picking my reviews to analyze.
The first blog I choose to analyze is The Movie Blog because
I would think the author, as a Canadian independent filmmaker and a journalist,
would give a quality review given his job. The first thing I noticed was the
Twilight-like picture in the blog and sure enough that’s how John Campea
started off. If you haven’t been around the internet, you should know that
people tend to mock Twilight and its love story, as well as Kristen Stewarts
lack of facial expression. So for the review to open up to a comparison of
that, with a given example picture that looks creepily similar to the Twilight
posters, it doesn’t set up the most ‘Yeah! Let’s go see this!” impression. As
he goes on he uses words such as “tolerable” and “sometimes very enjoyable”
which really doesn’t help the case of the movie at all with the negative
connotation. I mean really, who wants to go see a movie that is described as just
‘tolerable’? Moving down the lines of text and accompany pictures, Campea starts
to develop the idea that the movie is good and that the style kept his “interest
the entire time”. He sets up a picture in your mind of the zombie movement in
the second to last paragraph as he calls in his own, and most of society’s,
idea of a zombie walk and attributes and how this movie doesn’t follow along
that path. I think his testimony of seeing and enjoying it and not to go in as
a zombie movement critique is a good way was well received to readers. I
particularly like when he described it as having “comedy and drama…inconsistently
spread…in a good way” because it’s an honest way to get the point across.
Campea also used pictures with captions underneath that were question comparisons
that would definitely draw you into reading it if you hadn’t yet.
The next blog Pink is the New Blog doesn’t give of the
more professional vibe that the other one did and all I know about the author
is that he is a runner and he goes by Trent. He starts off opening the review
with a snippet of his day, which was apparently frustrating, and then goes off
into talking about the movie, which was a lot shorter than Campea’s. He uses similar
pictures as the other blog, but gives off a negative take on the movie throughout
the blog rather than enjoying it. This vibe is given by his word choice of “wears
thin”, “hurts”, “decent” and “weak”, as well as making only a paragraph of the
blog about the movie and the rest on his day. As a reader looking for a good
movie this would turn me off of the movie because it seems Trent pays more
attention to the day then the movie itself, and even then he doesn’t give it
much credit. He does use pictures of the movie but those are overshadowed by
pictures of the beach he spent the day at. Overall his lack of enjoyment of the
movie is dully noted and in comparison to Campea, lacking in evidence and
thorough review of all points. Both reviews get their point across of whether they
would recommend the movie or not through their overall tone. All and all this
common cultural facet of movie-watching can be reflected in people’s reviews,
and that either draws people into this culture or turns them away, which can be
reflected by both reviews I found.
Ace,
ReplyDeleteVery interesting! I have had similar findings on such things. It is eye opening how one little review can make us go, "nah, I don't really want to see that..." and for all we know we could have missed out on an amazing film! The only part I seem to be missing is the uses of logos, pathos and ethos. I feel like you explained them just without the bold terms specifying what was what. Other than that, very interesting blog post!
I totally agree with where you coming from! I really relate to this statement "...Twilight posters, it doesn’t set up the most ‘Yeah! Let’s go see this!” impression.", because I have been in this exact situation. It is crazy to think i took someone else advice, when i should just go see the movie, and based my opinion off that.
ReplyDeleteIts funny how people tend to listen to others opinions, instead of finding something out for themselves and i think that u explained that point very well. Now-a-days we tend to have others tell us how good something is, because we dont want to waste any of our own time finding out for ourselfs, but then we lose the fun of the adventure.
ReplyDelete